Re: Simple WebID, WebID+TLS Protocol, and ACL Dogfood Demo

On 8/10/13 1:20 PM, mca wrote:
> IMO, yes, you SHOULD do this as a way to document practice rather than 
> drive adoption. (standards follow, they don't lead).

+1

>
> you can do much of the "debate" in the IETF link rel list itself, if 
> that's important to you.
>
> and yes, you'll need some implementations to show that this is a good 
> idea. i suspect you have that now, right? at any rate, posting a 
> public effort to register can flush new ideas, competing 
> adoption/implementations and help create consensus.

+1

Kingsley
>
>
>
> mca
> +1.859.757.1449
> skype: mca.amundsen
> http://amundsen.com/blog/
> http://twitter.com/mamund
> https://github.com/mamund
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeamundsen
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net 
> <mailto:henry.story@bblfish.net>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 10 Aug 2013, at 18:14, mca <mca@amundsen.com
>     <mailto:mca@amundsen.com>> wrote:
>
>>     Now is the time to register a link relation value with the IANA.
>>
>>     It takes limited effort, need not slow your momentum and will
>>     make it easier to lead future development in this space.
>>
>     yes, though I think we should have a number of people together
>     first to back
>     the proposed link relation.
>
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-6.3
>
>     My guess is that we would have better chance of success if we can
>     show a mailing
>     list where the issue was debated,  a spec that describes the link
>     relation and
>     implementation that use it.
>
>
>
>>     On Aug 10, 2013 12:07 PM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net
>>     <mailto:henry.story@bblfish.net>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         On 10 Aug 2013, at 17:50, Kingsley Idehen
>>         <kidehen@openlinksw.com <mailto:kidehen@openlinksw.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         > On 8/9/13 8:34 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>         >> The protected resource will show you where the acl (meta)
>>         data is with the header rel="meta"
>>         > I thought the consensus was: rel="acl"
>>         >
>>         > I guess, we are just going to have to support both, to be
>>         safe .
>>
>>         There are still very few implementations, so this is the
>>         point where consensus can
>>         be reached at little cost.
>>
>>         I don't think that this problem was discussed yet in a forum
>>         where the implementers
>>         were present.
>>
>>         Henry
>>
>>         >
>>         > --
>>         >
>>         > Regards,
>>         >
>>         > Kingsley Idehen
>>         > Founder & CEO
>>         > OpenLink Software
>>         > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>>         <http://www.openlinksw.com/>
>>         > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>>         <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
>>         > Twitter/Identi.ca <http://Identi.ca> handle: @kidehen
>>         > Google+ Profile:
>>         https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
>>         > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>
>>         Social Web Architect
>>         http://bblfish.net/
>>
>>
>
>     Social Web Architect
>     http://bblfish.net/
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen