Re: Domain of :key

On 4/1/13 9:12 AM, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote:
>> Though I think we have consensus slightly in favour rdfs : Resource
> In which point rdf:Resource is better than owl:Thing? I do some 
> ontology state-of-the-art and I don't see too much ontologies with 
> uses rdfs:Resource in rdfs:domain or rdfs:range. My conclusion to 
> these aproaches is that rdfs:Resource is used in low-level ontologies 
> and cert ont isn't in that level. Probably better consensus is owl:Thing.
> Of course, I don't change my mind and I still think that foaf:Agent is 
> better.
>
> D. 

seeAlso:


1. http://bit.ly/X8lpGH -- query results following the triples added to 
my data space (which btw is WebID+TLS protected via ACLs that determine 
which identities are allowed to perform  Insert, Update, and Delete 
operations

2. http://bit.ly/14IilFY -- query definition that also has the SPARQL 
1.1 insert I executed prior commented .

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen