- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:01:22 +0100
- To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
- CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>, "public-philoweb@w3.org" <public-philoweb@w3.org>, "public-identity@w3.org" <public-identity@w3.org>, "public-privacy@w3.org" <public-privacy@w3.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Ben Laurie wrote: > Where we came in was me pointing out that if you disconnect your > identities by using multiple WebIDs, then you have a UI problem, and > since then the aim seems to have been to persuade us that multiple > WebIDs are not needed. Yup, it appears to boil down to a UI problem, and more specifically, a browser-ui problem. Multiple WeIDs are often needed, and the WebID protocol doesn't preclude that in any way shape or form. On a positive note, it's great to talk through these things and make sure that peoples concerns are voiced and noted :) Best, Nathan
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 10:02:24 UTC