- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:01:33 +0200
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <02E31238-CAB3-461D-8E3A-AE7EA397B25D@bblfish.net>
On 11 Oct 2012, at 13:31, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 10 Oct 2012, at 11:12, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > >> >> On 10 Oct 2012, at 01:37, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >> >>> Was just thinking.. if I let my domain expire (webr3.org), then somebody else can assume my WebIdentity. >>> >>> How would I invalidate that WebID <http://webr3.org/nathan#me> and use a new one? >> >> The same problem will exist with all forms of naming schemes I think. If you use a Tor server tied to a cryptographic key you can loose your key. >> >> One thing to do would be to let all the people who you form you social network with >> know to change your webid. >> >> The best is to do this before you loose your domain, perhaps by having your WebID profile >> redirect with a 301 to your new profile. The new profile would for a time have your old >> and your new WebID linked by owl:sameAs. >> >> But I think the question is here: is a 301 > > A duh. I meant a 302 Moved Permanently! I think I got that wrong in most of this > thread. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2012Apr/0006.html Arg! No I think Tim was wrong in that post. It is 301 Moved Permanently http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.2 > >> also a signal of a change of WebID, since >> the document has moved permanently, do #uris in the old document also need to be >> moved permanently? >> >> Henry >> >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 12:02:09 UTC