- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:18:55 -0500
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: WebID Group <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnG5VaoZnXXL0aZ36F6BaUekuiUyz2u-rS2cHMjH6J+67w@mail.gmail.com>
All, The minutes of the call today are available at [1]. We've made good progress on converging towards a consensus for the hash URIs debate. I've posted the results of straw poll of today's call at [2], showing close tie between 2. SHOULD and 3. HTTP(s) URI (MAY). We're planning to have a formal vote on this next week, so make sure to join the call if you care about this. Steph. [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/11/30-webid-minutes.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash#Poll_results On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>wrote: > WebID definition & moving WebID over TLS spec to the next version. > > Meeting Time: > Friday 23 November, 15:00 UTC, 16:00 Paris Time, 10:10 New York > full time zone information: http://timeanddate.com/s/2a97 > tel: +1-617-761-6200 > sip: zakim@voip.w3.org > irc: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/%23webid > > Agenda topics: > > - Cleaning up the arguments for Hash ( removing irrelevant ones, > organising others, > standardising language, shortening to essential the points ) > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash > > - Start WebID over TLS that we should look at and see if we they need to > be opened or > if we can close them, and what needs to be changed. > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/ > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl > [2] > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html#privacy > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > -- Steph.
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 16:19:27 UTC