W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > November 2012

Re: WebID teleconf, Friday 30 Nov

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:25:28 +0100
Cc: WebID Group <public-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <124577C4-2E78-497D-9847-339AB75A0C01@bblfish.net>
To: nathan@webr3.org

On 29 Nov 2012, at 22:11, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

> Henry Story wrote:
>> - Cleaning up the arguments for Hash ( removing irrelevant ones, organising others,
>>  standardising language, shortening to essential the points )
>>  http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash
> Good idea, but I'd suggest making a new wiki page for it and leaving the working one with everybody's input as is.

Wikis are there to be edited, and the history of the wiki
is always there to be gone back to. We can link to the current
version of the wiki ( which will always be available ) from the 
top as the page as the point where we started a communal exercise 
of bringing things together.

I think everyone has had time to put their arguments up, and they 
are mostly  very good. Good enough in  any case that I can see that 
there are good points on every side, and I am not clear what the outcome 
should be.

Some people may also have been convinced by the responses to the 
arguments, and perhaps feel that they want to remove their initial
points. We could move those to a different section.

But the aim of the exercise is to bring this debate to a closure. 
One part of this is to remove the egos from the arguments so that we can
all look at them dispassionately. We should not see this as
one team arguing against another team, but see how the arguments
function in and of themselves. 

So now that everyone has had time to add their ideas, we can now start
to work on making more sense of the arguments.


Social Web Architect

Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 00:26:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:46 UTC