- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:25:28 +0100
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: WebID Group <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <124577C4-2E78-497D-9847-339AB75A0C01@bblfish.net>
On 29 Nov 2012, at 22:11, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Henry Story wrote: >> - Cleaning up the arguments for Hash ( removing irrelevant ones, organising others, >> standardising language, shortening to essential the points ) >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash > > Good idea, but I'd suggest making a new wiki page for it and leaving the working one with everybody's input as is. Wikis are there to be edited, and the history of the wiki is always there to be gone back to. We can link to the current version of the wiki ( which will always be available ) from the top as the page as the point where we started a communal exercise of bringing things together. http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/index.php?title=WebID_Definition/hash&oldid=501 I think everyone has had time to put their arguments up, and they are mostly very good. Good enough in any case that I can see that there are good points on every side, and I am not clear what the outcome should be. Some people may also have been convinced by the responses to the arguments, and perhaps feel that they want to remove their initial points. We could move those to a different section. But the aim of the exercise is to bring this debate to a closure. One part of this is to remove the egos from the arguments so that we can all look at them dispassionately. We should not see this as one team arguing against another team, but see how the arguments function in and of themselves. So now that everyone has had time to add their ideas, we can now start to work on making more sense of the arguments. Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 00:26:24 UTC