On 21 November 2012 17:57, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote: > I'm told that people are "voting" by just answering the ML, with > non-consistent cross-posting on top of that. > > Can we have more chaos, please? I mean, seriously... > > W3C has some tools (WBS) to setup polls. Also, this must be proposed > by the chair to have some value. > Alex, it's just an (informal) straw poll. Nothing binding. Henry can call a formal vote, if required (I believe). > > Alexandre. > > > On 11/21/2012 11:30 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> On 11/21/12 11:04 AM, Henry Story wrote: >> >>> "Specifically" is not clear. >>> >>> In terms of language we can use MUST, SHOULD etc. >>> >>> So perhaps you can rephrase it in those terms. >>> >>> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri >>> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri >>> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP hash uri >>> >>> in all cases of course we agree that the URI MUST refer to an agent as >>> described in the current spec. >>> >>> Is this better? >>> >> >> I missed this part in my earlier response. That's fine re. straw poll >> vote (via email or use of Wiki doc), but corrected to read: >> >> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri >> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri >> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP uri >> [4] a WebID MUST be an HTTP uri . >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:05:05 UTC