- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:52:39 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: public-webid@w3.org
Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 11/20/12 2:50 PM, Andrei SAMBRA wrote: >> >> >> I think it may be useful also to explain how these WebIDs can >> then be used to >> create social networks - across servers. ( I can send a graphic of >> interlinked WebIDs for >> that ). >> >> >> Isn't this out of scope for the spec? It's up to each of us to decide >> how we want to use WebIDs. > > It's okay for a conceptual guide. Such a guide should have a least one > usecase scenario. The moment to get a profile graph from the > de-reference of a WebID you are in social web/network territory. WebID 1.0 is getting to the point where there's almost nothing to specify, it's a one liner of words which equate to "a dereferencable URI for an Agent", everything else I see is just padding, so may as well be padding which shows how WebIDs can be used, imho - if we're gunning for adoption here that is. Something I haven't noticed (may have missed), is any text which shows a distinction between an Agent Identifier, and an Identifier for a UserAccount, like twitter or g+.
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:53:43 UTC