- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:39:24 -0500
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50AAA70C.3030106@openlinksw.com>
On 11/19/12 4:04 PM, Andrei SAMBRA wrote: > > >> Facebook has hash URIs. A _billion_ hash URIs. > > > > > > That's and over simplification that leads to problems down the line. > To save time, how do those Billion plus hash based WebID hook into the > TLS based authentication protocol? > > They are valid WebIDs, though not using WebID-TLS at this point. I > guess you could consider them as using WebID-facebookConnect. That's > the reason why we've decoupled the authentication bit. :-) > > Andrei > I didn't say the weren't personal URIs (aka. WebIDs). I said: how do you use these URIs with WebID over TLS based authentication (aka. WebID authentication protocol). I wrote about Facebook a their Linked Data initiative a while back [1] :-) Links: 1. http://twitpic.com/5m2lu5 -- deconstructing Facebook's Linked Data space . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 21:39:46 UTC