- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:46:47 +0100
- To: j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at
- Cc: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+Zb3CuGdezV-Ts0B3RMht8ybN+i5N5Y4z0WX-RH2g8zg@mail.gmail.com>
On 16 November 2012 02:04, Jürgen Jakobitsch <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>wrote: > hi, > > analog to henry's mail for any kind of URI. > (henry stated that people => in favour <= of the #-ur(i|l) webid > definition should reply to the mail with subject "WebID definition > proposal with hash urls". - i think that's a good idea, these threads > get hard to read from time to time. > There can never be a 100% guarantee that a document is returned from a webid, e.g. the server may be down. The WebID is a pointer and SHOULD be dereferencable > > PROPOSAL turnguard > > A WebID is a URI that denotes an Agent, like a Person, Group, > Organization, Software or the like. When dereferenced the WebID returns > a document that uniquely describes its referent. > > comments : > > 1. so i'm +0.9 for kingsley's suggestion > 2. i'd add an example of what uniquely describes means > 3. i'd add a sentence that lead from unique description to the realm of > authentication (something like : some unique descriptions (like a > cert:key, foaf:openid) may be used to authenticate some may not. with a > link to webID + TLS > > wkr j > > > > > -- > | Jürgen Jakobitsch, > | Software Developer > | Semantic Web Company GmbH > | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 > | A - 1070 Wien, Austria > | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 > > COMPANY INFORMATION > | web : http://www.semantic-web.at/ > | foaf : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch > PERSONAL INFORMATION > | web : http://www.turnguard.com > | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard > | g+ : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts > | skype : jakobitsch-punkt > | xmlns:tg = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#" >
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 12:47:15 UTC