- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 22:00:08 +0100
- To: elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2012 21:00:37 UTC
On 4 March 2012 18:04, elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > Hello, > > After pointing my friend to WebID, he have shared this comment (original > linked later): > > "After reading the WebID specification once again, I'm not so sure > anymore, whether I would want to use it. > > As described in section 2.2, the public key is published via the WebID > Profile, which is basically a FOAF profile. While section 3.4.2 does note > that "An HTTPS WebID will therefore be a lot more trustworthy than an HTTP > WebID by a factor of the likelihood of man in the middle attacks", however > the whole system is only as trustworthy as the hierarchical CA system > currently in place. > > How can a web-of-trust be useful, if all the trust is based on a trust > system that has been shown to be untrustworthy for more than a decade?" > > https://heahdk.net/~nil/news/0005-webid-revisited > Certificates are self signed, so a CA is never involved. > > Any references to previous discussion on this issue? > Thanks! > ~ elf Pavlik ~ > >
Received on Sunday, 4 March 2012 21:00:37 UTC