- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:14:37 -0500
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F235A0D.6060005@openlinksw.com>
On 1/27/12 6:51 PM, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote: > hi kingsley, > > i think i'm gonna do something similar along the lines > below. i just cannot do it with url-params since i have > to stick to realm-api's methods. > > i notice that one stays logged on your verifier now, > so two subsequent checks are not possible without > clearing cache and cookies manually. if i remember > it right that was previously not the case. Hmmm. I need to double check if something has changed in this new cut. Kingsley > > wkr j > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kingsley Idehen"<kidehen@openlinksw.com> > To: public-webid@w3.org > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 12:18:48 AM > Subject: Re: Certificate Expiry (summary) > > On 1/27/12 7:47 AM, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote: >> hi, >> >> is there a final conclusion on this issue yet, >> which an implementor can rely on? >> >> i think it would be a good idea to write a couple >> of lines into spec about this. from only reading >> the spec now, i have no clue what to do with the dates >> in a certificate. >> >> at current the best solution for WebIDRealm seems >> to simply have some boolean flags that get read on startup. >> >> mindCertificateNotYetValid (=true|false) >> mindCertificateExpired (=true|false) >> >> wkr j > See: http://id.myopenlink.net/ods/webid_demo.html . > > For now we've made the expiration check optional. > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 02:15:02 UTC