- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:50:39 +0100
- To: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Cc: WebID Group <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <A4155FE0-24FC-4111-A9F6-DC513DE6F0E2@bblfish.net>
On 6 Dec 2012, at 18:47, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > As I am following the privacy working group right now, it reminded me of the > following things we can do to help: > > 1. for me to update the picture in the WebID spec to have a link to a protected document > ( at least another document ) > That would be useful, but not for the main architecture picture. Maybe have a second picture in the privacy section which also includes the protected resource? > > > > 2. for the privacy section to have an example where the user > publishes a public key only and a nickname and a logo perhaps, with > a rdfs:seeAlso pointing to a protected resource > > I think we have this example right now in the draft spec. I think I was trying to highlight the idea of putting a public key there, as with a TLS WebID spec. The idea is that one can identify someone without saying anything about themselves, other than that they know a private key, that they are the only ones to have access to. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html#privacy > > Andrei > > > Henry > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2012 17:51:17 UTC