Re: Possible planning for new tech talk

I thought getting some notes in the hands of WG participants ahead of the
call would be helpful to facilitate the discussion, but this is not
required - if you think you want (/ need / better off) to prep the ground
with the presentation first, and then distribute the notes, it'd work fine
too.

And yes, if you can make it to Spain for the WG F2F meeting in September,
it would be great and very helpful, and there is obviously a good reason
for that.

Vlad


On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 3:33 PM Skef Iterum <siterum@adobe.com> wrote:

> So, to be clear, notes first and then meeting? I'm not sure I agree that's
> the best way to ramp up but if that's the general feeling I can do things
> that way.
>
> As I've said I don't currently anticipate attending TPAC 2023 in person
> but that isn't necessarily set in stone as of now.
>
> Skef
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Vladimir Levantovsky <vladimir.levantovsky@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 29, 2023 12:27 PM
> *To:* Skef Iterum <siterum@adobe.com>
> *Cc:* public-webfonts-wg@w3.org <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Possible planning for new tech talk
>
>
> *EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.*
>
>
> Hi Skef,
>
> Thank you for your efforts getting corporate clearance to discuss your
> ideas with the group, we’ve been looking forward to hearing about it for a
> while now.
>
> In my opinion FWIW , it would be most effective if we start with
> distributing and reviewing your notes and any additional materials you can
> share, then scheduling a dedicated Zoom meeting for you to present, and we
> also have the F2F group meeting coming up at TPAC in early September, which
> would be another great opportunity to discuss this live and in details
> (hoping that some of us, including yourself, would be able to attend in
> person).
>
> Thanks again for your efforts to make it happen.
> Vlad
>
> On Jun 29, 2023, at 1:37 PM, Skef Iterum <siterum@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> 
> I'm just about through the corporate processes needed to allow me to
> present the new ideas I have been working on and have vaguely alluded to
> over the past few months. As there is a fair amount of material, I'd like
> to do a substantial introductory talk to get everyone up ramped up, so that
> we can decide whether it, or something that evolves out of it, might be a
> viable alternative to the range-request spec.
>
> I'm wondering if any or all of the following would be possible:
>
>    1. We at least nominally, and perhaps formally, schedule a longer
>    meeting than normal, so if there are questions or discussions that would be
>    better to have immediately following my presentation, those people who are
>    free can stay and other people can read the minutes later.
>    2. We record the presentation itself in zoom (I'd prefer someone else
>    be in charge of that), store it somewhere sensible, and make a link to it
>    available in the minutes. (I presume for the discussion after we would go
>    back to our usual practice of just providing minutes.)
>    3. Rather than have someone have to be scribe for my talk, I will
>    provide my notes in advance for that purpose, and then someone can be in
>    charge of recording questions and answers that come up during the
>    presentation.
>
> It seems like this would be the most effective way to get the rest of the
> group ramped up on a lot of info quickly.
>
> Skef
>
>