- From: Garret Rieger <grieger@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 11:02:41 -0600
- To: Vladimir Levantovsky <vladimir.levantovsky@gmail.com>
- Cc: Web Fonts Working Group <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM=OCWZAwrurt=VFC-n15oNDBE_Q1ozCokSQvaTe60Vk1yZyNg@mail.gmail.com>
I'd prefer overlapSimpleBitmap. On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 2:20 PM Vladimir Levantovsky < vladimir.levantovsky@gmail.com> wrote: > Minutes of today’s discussion are online at > https://www.w3.org/2021/05/25-webfonts-minutes.html > > > > Summary of the WOFF2 changes to accommodate simple glyph flags bit 6 > (OVERLAP_SIMPLE) bit array (see Simple Glyph Flags description for details, > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/glyf). > > > > In WOFF2 “Transformed ‘glyf’ table format” ( > https://www.w3.org/TR/WOFF2/#glyf_table_format), make the following > changes: > > 1) Change the datatype of the existing “version” field from Fixed to > UInt16 with reserved value 0x0000. > > 2) Immediately after the updated “version” field, introduce a new > UInt16 field named “optionFlags”. Designate the bit 0x0001 to be the flag > indicating the presence of the newly defined flag6Bitmap[] bit array. > > 3) In the end of the table, add the UInt8 flag6Bitmap[] – a > numGlyphs-long bit array that provides values for the flag [bit 6] for each > simple glyph. (Flag values for composite glyphs are already encoded as part > of the compositeStream[].) > > 4) Add the following descriptive text: > “The optionFlags field bit 0 indicates the presence of the additional > flag6Bitmap[] bit array, all other bits are reserved and should be cleared. > If all simple glyphs of the input font have OVERLAP_SIMPLE flags set to > zero, the encoder MUST clear bit 0 of the optionFlags field and omit the > flag6Bitmap[] bit array. If at least one of the simple glyphs in the input > font have the flags bit 6 set, the encoder must set the optionFlags bit 0 > to “1”, and MUST create the additional flag6Bitmap[] bit array where the > corresponding bits MUST be set to the values of the flag bit 6 of each > simple glyph in the input font. > > The decoder MUST check the optionFlags bit0 value to determine whether the > additional flag6Bitmap[] is included as part of the transformed ‘glyf’ > table. If the additional flag6Bitmap[] bit array is not present, upon > reconstruction of the simple glyphs flags the decoder MUST set all > OVERLAP_SIMPLE flag values to zero. If flag6Bitmap[] is included, the > decode MUST use flag6Bitmap[] bit settings to reconstruct OVERLAP_SIMPLE > flag values, and set the corresponding flag6Bitmap[] bit value as flag bit > 6 on the first flag byte for each simple glyph of the output font” > > > > Question to the WG: I am considering two possible names for the new > additional bit array – flag6Bitmap[] (used above as part of the proposed > changes, which is derived from the simple glyphs flags bit 6 value), or the > more verbose [and more descriptive] “overlapSimpleBitmap[]”. > > What would be your preference for the new array name? > > > Thank you, > > Vlad > > > >
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2021 17:03:12 UTC