Re: Evaluation Report Comments

All those comments now incorporated. Thanks!

On 2020-10-13 03:54, Garret Rieger wrote:
> Read through the report and just a couple of comments:
>
>   * In the description of the web corpus there's no mention of what
>     fonts were used. I suggest mentioning that the font corpus
>     consisted entirely of fonts from the open source Google Fonts
>     collection (found here: https://github.com/google/fonts
>     <https://github.com/google/fonts>).
>   * You link to the raw results in the appendix of the simulation
>     results document, may also be worth pointing out the raw results
>     can be found in CSV form here:
>     https://github.com/w3c/PFE-analysis/tree/master/results/07-08-2020
>     <https://github.com/w3c/PFE-analysis/tree/master/results/07-08-2020>
>   * I mentioned this at the meeting today, but I'll mention it again
>     here: patch subset (and possibly range request) can be made to
>     automatically behave as 'whole font' dependent on the network
>     conditions. This could be used to ensure that in the worst
>     performing cases (such as 2G) it has identical performance to
>     whole font. This is important because it means that site operators
>     don't need special case 2G and 3G font loading if they decide to
>     use a PFE technique. I think it would be good to point this out in
>     the eval report.
>
-- 
Chris Lilley
@svgeesus
Technical Director @ W3C
W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media