- From: Garret Rieger <grieger@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:34:03 -0700
- To: "w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org)" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM=OCWYeX2r+TzVbFSHn=LN1zhdYPbGWjzfWAsxKu=i0=3tkzg@mail.gmail.com>
It may be a good idea to point out the two caveats mentioned above when presenting the bytes reduction graphs in the evaluation report to avoid misinterpreting those numbers as the reductions expected for a single font viewed in isolation. On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 2:32 PM Garret Rieger <grieger@google.com> wrote: > Here's my attempt at creating a graph that has the total bytes transferred > for a font across the three tested methods: > > https://github.com/w3c/PFE-analysis/pull/56/files > > Some notes: > > - I stuck with the same style graph as used in the percentage graphs > as it lets us easily show distributions. I changed the line colour to blue > since there's no good/bad distinction on this graph. > - I derived the values on the graph by applying the percentage > reductions from the simulation results to the "worst case" woff2 font size > for each language group (the 95th percentile font size). > - This gives an estimate of the amount of bytes that would be > transferred for a font of that size. > - However, there are a couple important caveats: > - % reduction from the simulation is the reduction over a sequence > of page views and is *not representative of the reduction in bytes > transferred for loading a single page*. The reduction for a single > page is likely to be higher than for a sequence of page views. > - Similarly the reduction is the aggregate of all fonts on a given > page. So for something like CJK that means there could be latin or other > language fonts mixed in. Thus the percent reductions *are not > representative of the reductions you'd see for a single CJK font in > isolation*. Again I believe the reduction is actually larger for a > single CJK font on a single page. > - Unfortunately the simulation results were not recorded at the font > level but at the page view level, so there isn't a way to the true per font > reduction percentages out of the results we currently have. > > > Next up I'm working on generating graphs of the font size distributions. > >
Received on Monday, 12 October 2020 21:34:33 UTC