Results of Simulation using Monotype Provided Fonts

I re-ran the simulation with the monotype provided fonts using the adobe
data set sequences. Results are attached.

Performance is similar to the previously released results, however for
these fonts the incxfer strategies are less efficient (165% size of optimal
vs 120% of optimal), but still transfer far less bytes then unicode range
and whole fonts. Similar to the last results the incxfer strategies have
lower overall cost on most connections and lose to unicode range/whole font
on very slow high RTT connections.

Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2020 18:54:40 UTC