- From: Garret Rieger <grieger@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:53:02 -0800
- To: "w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org)" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 December 2020 21:53:32 UTC
Previously I reported the effect on performance of adding woff2 glyf transformation to patch subset patch computation for CJK. I just finished running the same test against the Arabic, Indic, and LGC data sets. Results are looking very good for those scripts as well. We see a pretty similar reduction in total bytes transferred of 10-15%: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/googlefonts/PFE-analysis/woff2_plots/results/07-08-2020/comparison.woff2.arabic_indic.sampled_500.bytes.png https://raw.githubusercontent.com/googlefonts/PFE-analysis/woff2_plots/results/07-08-2020/comparison.woff2.arabic_indic.sampled_500.cost.png https://raw.githubusercontent.com/googlefonts/PFE-analysis/woff2_plots/results/07-08-2020/comparison.woff2.latin.sampled_1000.bytes.png https://raw.githubusercontent.com/googlefonts/PFE-analysis/woff2_plots/results/07-08-2020/comparison.woff2.latin.sampled_1000.cost.png
Received on Monday, 7 December 2020 21:53:32 UTC