- From: Roderick Sheeter <rsheeter@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:11:47 -0700
- To: Myles Maxfield <mmaxfield@apple.com>
- Cc: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>, WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABscrrF_N7DA8FG7g6Er7EZsDRAzTa_bOCm01ouz2C7dkGN-Eg@mail.gmail.com>
FYI I don't expect to make the call tomorrow (it's a bit of an awkward time for me) On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 4:04 PM Myles C. Maxfield <mmaxfield@apple.com> wrote: > I don’t know if we’ll have time, but I’d like to have a discussion about > flashiness. > > I think we’ve all settled on a design where, during initial page load, > some subset of a font is downloaded from a server. Then, as the page > content changes, there would be subsequent downloads from the server, and > somehow a way of joining the new response with the old response. What > should browsers show during the second download? > > > - One option is the way unicode-range behaves, where a random half of > the characters scattered throughout the newly-added text are rendered, and > the remaining ones are invisible. I have accidentally caused behavior like > this in WebKit before (in English content), and we heard howls from users > about it. > - Another option is for the browser to somehow separate the “new text” > from the “old text” and render none of the “new text” but keep rendering > all of the “old text”. Keeping these two sets distinct is perhaps > unimplementable, especially in the presence of things like React that have > “virtual DOMs” and automatic diffing > - Guarantee that, for every alphabetic language/script, the entire > alphabet always be transferred together. This wouldn’t help the scripts > that need progressive enhancement the most, may not work with combining > marks even in alphabetic scripts. > - Maybe someone smarter than me can come up with something better? > > > Thanks, > Myles > > On Mar 26, 2019, at 9:07 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir < > Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote: > > Folks, > > Here is what I have on my list of tentative topics for this week’s telcon: > > 1. Review the results of the F2F survey > <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44556/WebFontsWG-Sep2019F2F/results> and > firm up our meeting plans (venue, prep work, etc.) > 2. WOFF2 bug fixes/maintenance <https://github.com/w3c/woff/issues> > 3. Enriching Variable Fonts (see list archive for details > <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Mar/thread.html> > ) > 4. Progressive Font Enrichment strategy and legacy support > <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Mar/0004.html> > 5. Housekeeping – review and updates on action items > <https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open> > 6. AOB > > > See call connection notes for details > <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Jan/0026.html> > . > Thanks, > Vlad > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2019 01:12:25 UTC