Re: Taking the WG temperature before our scheduled call tomorrow

I'll be flying tomorrow and unable to make the meeting, so would prefer
option 2 as well.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:56 AM Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Vlad,
>
> Option 2 sounds sensible to me.
>
> (There's a good chance I may not be able to make next week's call, as
> I'll be travelling -- depends how my schedule shapes up. But that's
> secondary.)
>
> JK
>
> On 12/06/2019 17:24, Ken Lunde wrote:
> > Vladimir,
> >
> > For reasons that Jason stated, Option 2 sounds better.
> >
> > Regards...
> >
> > -- Ken
> >
> >> On Jun 12, 2019, at 9:20 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir <
> Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> On May 30, during our WG telcon (see minutes [1]) we discussed Garret’s
> proposal [2] for a unified framework for performance evaluation of
> different approaches to progressive font enrichment (PFE). Part of the
> discussion was about collecting real life data for sets of Unicode
> codepoints to be used as input data for performance analysis, and Peter
> Muller suggested that the tools he developed earlier could be used to
> generate codepoints dataset from actual page walks [3].
> >>
> >> On another subject of WG telcon scheduling, we started a Doodle poll
> [4] to collect info on individual member time preferences and availability.
> We still do not have responses from many of the new WG participants, and
> including them in this poll was the main reason for re-evaluation of the
> current call schedule.
> >>
> >> For our scheduled call time tomorrow, I’d like you to voice your
> opinion on the following options:
> >>      • Conduct the WG call tomorrow at the regularly scheduled time
> (16:00 UTC). If we do, the proposed agenda topics would be:
> >> - Input data for PFE performance analysis, and
> >> - Preliminary results of the Doodle poll (other agenda+ items welcome!)
> >>      • Postpone the call until next week when we hopefully have more
> data and Doodle poll responses to discuss. (Considering that some of us are
> participants of the OpenType /VF font format discussion happening in
> Seattle this week, postponing the call may be a sensible option.)
> >>
> >> Please respond to this email with your preference (option 1 or 2) and
> any agenda+ topics you’d like to propose.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Vlad
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/2019/05/30-webfonts-minutes.html
> >> [2]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kx62tpy5hGIbHh6tHMAryon9Sgye--W_IsHTeCMlmEo/edit
> >> [3]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019May/0025.html
> >> [4] https://doodle.com/poll/p9shqwr38k5y6dzf
> >
>
>
>