- From: Ned Holbrook <ned@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:22:25 -0800
- To: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 22:23:39 UTC
Indeed. DSIG is only a clue to provenance, not intent. > On Jan 14, 2019, at 5:33 AM, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com> wrote: > > Suppose we required webfonts to have valid DSIG signatures, or something like that. What difference would it make here? None, afaict; the bad guy could just sign the font and proceed in exactly the same way. A signature does nothing to guarantee that the font resource isn't going to mislead the reader.
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 22:23:39 UTC