- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:44:32 +0000
- To: "w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org)" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 12:44:59 UTC
A: When a major security research company discovers that scumbags are now using it for their phishing campaigns! (https://www.siliconrepublic.com/enterprise/phishing-web-fonts-fake) I must admit that using webfonts as a substitution cypher is a clever idea, and I can see some potentially good uses for it (imagine building a secure communication channel where a cypher is switched algorithmically by e.g. using different font style/weights), but it also begs another question to be asked - were we too optimistic when we declared DSIG to be of no significant importance for webfonts / WOFF2? And, do we need to update "Security considerations" section knowing that webfonts could be a much more treacherous grounds than we previously imagined? Thanks, Vlad
Received on Monday, 14 January 2019 12:44:59 UTC