Re: WOFF2 erratum

PR merged, errata updated

https://www.w3.org/Fonts/REC-WOFF2-20180301-errata.html

On 26-Apr-18 07:29, Chris Lilley wrote:
> Looks like we have our first WOFF2 erratum. The pseudo-code used an 
> assignment (=) where it should have been a comparison (==).
>
> https://github.com/w3c/woff/pull/3/files?diff=unified
>
> This looks obvious, so unless I hear shouts to the contrary, on Monday 
> I will
>
> a) merge the PR to update the editors draft
> b) add this to the (currently empty) errata document
> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/REC-WOFF2-20180301-errata.html
>
-- 
Chris Lilley
@svgeesus
Technical Director @ W3C
W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media

Received on Monday, 30 April 2018 20:43:33 UTC