- From: Roderick Sheeter <rsheeter@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:16:29 +0000
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
- Cc: "w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org)" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABscrrH7Hd=XgPkeR6dSJB6dteeunfA5raHuBx9r0_WWYK0Pvw@mail.gmail.com>
Will be there. Topic barnstorming: > A way to not break opentype features when they span files (e.g. unicode-range shouldn't break things) > An effort specifically aimed at CJK compression. On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:23 AM Levantovsky, Vladimir < Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote: > Folks, > > > > The F2F (scheduled on Nov. 9) is rapidly approaching, and with the WOFF2 > being on its way to PR we have only few things left to do before the > current group charter runs its course. > > > > Last year, during our F2F @ ATypI we identified a number of things (see > “Big discussion on new work items” in [1]) that would be of value for this > WG to consider, but not much has happened since. I think it would be useful > for us as a group to revisit those items to see if they are still deemed > relevant and useful, and discuss other things that you might wish to bring > up – don’t be bashful! > > > > Also, in my first item to solicit for agenda+ items for the F2F [2] I > proposed a topic format that I think will be very helpful to get us all up > to speed and make the F2F productive – if you could please submit your > proposed items in that format it would be great, but the most important > part is to SUBMIT – formatting is of no concern if we have nothing to > discuss. > > > > I do realize that some/many of the issues that were brought up may not be > seen as “in scope” of traditional W3C WG work, and that not every problem > we identified can be fixed in this forum – we might want to dedicate some > time and discuss if certain problems we see might actually be suitable to > be addressed by other forums. E.g., looking at the last year CJK related > discussion I wonder if making a submission that would fix ISO/IEC 14496-28 > CFR standard might be a helpful endeavor – we can do it via an established > liaison relationship between W3C and MPEG. > > > > Again, we have only a couple of weeks left before the big TPAC week, and I > am looking forward to seeing many of you there and at the F2F. > > If you could please reply to this email with: > > - Your proposed agenda topic, and/or > > - Whether you plan to be there in person for the F2F on November > 9 > > I’d very much appreciate it! > > > > Thank you, > > Vlad > > > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2016/09/12-webfonts-minutes.html > > [2] > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2017Sep/0011.html > > > >
Received on Monday, 23 October 2017 16:17:03 UTC