- From: David Kuettel <kuettel@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 10:21:04 -0700
- To: "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAYUqgGURdA2+N=JqWNXVFcO9ggDHsAobZ9OKnQjxrx3tt+cMw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello working group, As follow up from my action item from yesterday: WOFF-ACTION-204: Dig through http archive for woff2 deployment numbers <http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/204> http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/204 Here is a breakdown of the font usage by type across the HTTP Archive corpus. Specifically, a breakdown of the font file extensions requested by the browser (Chrome) over the entire corpus (Alexa Top 500K home pages) > bq query "select count(*) as count, ext from [httparchive:runs.latest_requests] where ext in ('woff2', 'woff', 'ttf', 'otf') group by ext order by count desc"; +--------+-------+ | count | ext | +--------+-------+ | 919165 | woff2 | 70.4% | 304407 | woff | 23.3% | 69348 | ttf | 5.3% | 12517 | otf | 0.9% +--------+-------+ WOFF 2.0 is clearly the runaway winner @ 70.4%, with WOFF 2.0 coming in second @ 23.3%. Ship it! -- Key links for reference: HTTP Archive: http://httparchive.org/ Latest Requests (from April 15th, 2017): https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/httparchive:runs.latest_requests?pli=1 The earlier "Web Font Media Type Analysis 2015" which leveraged the HTTP Archive data and elaborated on how to extract the info: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2015Feb/0009.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Tsju6EOP4LqJ1RcFJRpqxryggbWZYbq5jvsIhVYNoyU/edit# Thank you, David
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2017 17:21:58 UTC