Telcon Minutes Feb 10, 2016

https://www.w3.org/2016/02/10-webfonts-minutes.html

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                 WebFonts Working Group Teleconference

10 Feb 2016

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2016/02/10-webfonts-irc

Attendees

   Present
          sergeym, kuettel, Vlad, RSheeter, chrisl, kenlundeadobe,
          jfkthame, MysteryObservers

   Regrets
          Khaled

   Chair
          vlad

   Scribe
          RSheeter

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]disposition of comments on WOFF 2.0
         2. [5]CTS Review
         3. [6]Action Items
         4. [7]Other Topics
     * [8]Summary of Action Items
     * [9]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <Vlad> scribenick: RSheeter

   Enter The Chris

   <ChrisL>
   [10]https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html

     [10] https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html

disposition of comments on WOFF 2.0

   [11]https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html

     [11] https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html

   <ChrisL>
   [12]https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html#issu
   e-6

     [12] https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/DoC/issues-2015.html#issue-6

   <ChrisL>
   [13]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/201
   5May/0041.html

     [13] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2015May/0041.html

CTS Review

   Wherein the colors of text may be changed

   (red – need WG review/input, grey – not yet implemented, black
   – done)

   [14]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustR
   ejectInvalidBase128

     [14] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustRejectInvalidBase128

   Rod: not entirely sure tests cover all specified scenarios. We
   do have some tests here.

   <ChrisL> oh, oops sorry!

   action rsheeter Check UA test
   [15]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustR
   ejectInvalidBase128

     [15] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustRejectInvalidBase128

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-195 - Check ua test
   [16]https://www.w3.org/fonts/wg/wiki/testplan20-useragent#mustr
   ejectinvalidbase128 [on Roderick Sheeter - due 2016-02-17].

     [16] https://www.w3.org/fonts/wg/wiki/testplan20-useragent#mustrejectinvalidbase128

   [17]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustA
   cceptAllTransforms

     [17] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustAcceptAllTransforms

   [18]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustL
   oadFontCollection

     [18] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustLoadFontCollection

   Vlad: contingent on browser support

   ChrisL: they don't and it hasn't been entirely clear how they
   should to date

   <ChrisL> ah okay, good that OTS has the support

   (discussion of whether any browser supports, what might be
   needed to make it happen)

   ChrisL: I have created a normative reference for how to refer
   to fonts in a collection

   (link?)

   <ChrisL>
   [19]https://github.com/svgeesus/ietf-justfont/commit/b47e71a160
   40ea7d4e837287b968dd80f61caa71

     [19] https://github.com/svgeesus/ietf-justfont/commit/b47e71a16040ea7d4e837287b968dd80f61caa71

   (pause for reduction in wishy washy)

   <ChrisL> <t hangText="Fragment Identifiers">Optional, for
   collections encoded as WOFF 2.0. A positive integer.

   <ChrisL> + For example, #2 refers to the second font

   <ChrisL> + in the collection. If a fragment is not specified,
   it is the same as #1 i.e. the first font

   <ChrisL> + in the collection (or the only font, if it is not a
   collection). If a fragment is specified, and

   <ChrisL> + the WOFF does not encode a collection, the fragment
   is ignored.</t>

   [20]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustB
   eRejected-FailTransform

     [20] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustBeRejected-FailTransform

   (needs revision; refers to transform 3 as invalid but 3 is now
   valid)

   Vlad: points out that 1 and 2 are undefined still and thus
   usable

   [21]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustC
   heckLSBFlags

     [21] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent#mustCheckLSBFlags

   [22]https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool#m
   ustClearEmptyBBox, needs description

     [22] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool#mustClearEmptyBBox,

   action vlad Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour
   glyphs

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-196 - Review treatment of empty
   glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due
   2016-02-17].

   <KenLundeAdobe> Adobe Blank:
   [23]https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank

     [23] https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank

   <KenLundeAdobe> Adobe Blank 2 (uses the Format 13 'cmap'
   subtable): [24]https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank-2

     [24] https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank-2

   (discussion of AT LSB tests)

   Vlad: test verifies collections with hmtx shared are handled
   intelligently (only xform if valid for all pairings)

   action sergeym Investigate font collections; how are glyf/hmtx
   shared in practice

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-197 - Investigate font collections;
   how are glyf/hmtx shared in practice [on Sergey Malkin - due
   2016-02-17].

Action Items

   action-186?

   <trackbot> action-186 -- Roderick Sheeter to Try time (decode)
   and size for null glyf/loca xform vs regular vs woff1 -- due
   2016-03-02 -- OPEN

   <trackbot> [25]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186

     [25] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/186

   (kicked date out a few weeks)

   Vlad: There was some question of face to face. After
   discussion, no immediate need for face to face

Other Topics

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [26]scribe.perl version
    1.144 ([27]CVS log)
    $Date: 2016/02/10 21:58:50 $
     __________________________________________________________

     [26] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [27] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

   [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34
Check for newer version at [28]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/

     [28] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found ScribeNick: RSheeter
Inferring Scribes: RSheeter

WARNING: Replacing list of attendees.
Old list: (no_one)
New list: sergeym kuettel Vlad RSheeter chrisl kenlundeadobe jfkthame

Default Present: sergeym, kuettel, Vlad, RSheeter, chrisl, kenlundeadobe
, jfkthame
Present: sergeym kuettel Vlad RSheeter chrisl kenlundeadobe jfkthame Mys
teryObservers
Regrets: Khaled
Found Date: 10 Feb 2016
Guessing minutes URL: [29]http://www.w3.org/2016/02/10-webfonts-minutes.
html
People with action items:

     [29] http://www.w3.org/2016/02/10-webfonts-minutes.html

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.



   [End of [30]scribe.perl diagnostic output]

     [30] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm

Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 22:01:13 UTC