- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:03:58 +0300
- To: Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org>
- Cc: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
On 2016-08-16 11:44, Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:12:25PM +0300, Chris Lilley wrote: >> >> On 2016-08-15 12:36, Khaled Hosny wrote: >>> Is it normal that the transformed ‘glyf’ table (before compression) being >>> (much) larger than the original? >> Provided the compressed, transformed table is smaller than the compressed, >> original table would be. > WOFF1 has such a requirement[1] but it was removed from WOFF2, D'oh, yes. It was. Never mind. > and since > in WOFF2 we don’t compress tables individually the AT will need to > compress the whole table data multiple times to measure the difference, > or compress the individual affected table and hope that the compression > ration will be the same when the table data is compressed (which might > not be true for Brotli). > > Regards, > Khaled > > 1. https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/spec/#conform-compressedlarger -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2016 09:04:09 UTC