- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:12:25 +0300
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
On 2016-08-15 12:36, Khaled Hosny wrote: > Is it normal that the transformed ‘glyf’ table (before compression) being > (much) larger than the original? Provided the compressed, transformed table is smaller than the compressed, original table would be. -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Monday, 15 August 2016 13:12:40 UTC