- From: Roderick Sheeter <rsheeter@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:21:34 -0700
- To: Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org>
- Cc: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 22:22:04 UTC
Unfortunately I don't believe the syntax has been formally agreed on and no browser I'm aware of supports it. I think the best we can do is implement a test based on the explicit assumption (perhaps we should note in test plan?) that the #N syntax will work. Or drop the test. WG ... thoughts? On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org> wrote: > I’m trying to implement: > https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent# > mustLoadFontCollection > > But no UA supports font collections, which has been discussed several > times before but I’m not sure what the conclusion is. Particularly, how > should individual fonts inside the collections be referred to? Fragment > identifiers are suggested here, but I’m not sure how widely agreed upon > is it: > https://github.com/svgeesus/ietf-justfont/commit/ > b47e71a16040ea7d4e837287b968dd80f61caa71 > > Regards, > Khaled > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 22:22:04 UTC