Re: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:48:05PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The “Decoding of Simple Glyphs” suggests that instructionLength is
> always set for any glyph, but the reference implementation seems to
> write/read it only if numberOfContours is > 0.

Reading again, I think this can be inferred from the paragraph preceding
this section, but I still think an explicit note is needed.

Regards,
Khaled

Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 19:08:36 UTC