Tuesday, 31 March 2015
- Telcon reminder and agenda for Wed. Apr. 1st
- Re: Question on DSIG and head flag 11
- Re: Question on DSIG and head flag 11
- RE: Question on DSIG and head flag 11
- Question on DSIG and head flag 11
Monday, 30 March 2015
- RE: New version of the WOFF2 spec posted
- Re: New version of the WOFF2 spec posted
- New version of the WOFF2 spec posted
- RE: Non-zero loca transformLength
- RE: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
Sunday, 29 March 2015
Saturday, 28 March 2015
Friday, 27 March 2015
- Re: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
- RE: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
- RE: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
- Re: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
- Re: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
- RE: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
- Re: Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
- Question about instructionLength of simple glyphs
Thursday, 26 March 2015
Wednesday, 25 March 2015
- Minutes, 25 March 2015 webfonts wg call
- WOFF-ACTION-170: Give estimate of initial number of tests started
- WOFF-ACTION-169: Explain cff compression has no preprocessing so less gain
- WOFF-ACTION-168: Measure ram useage for woff2 vs. woff1
- Re: Telcon reminder and agenda for March 25
Tuesday, 24 March 2015
Monday, 23 March 2015
Friday, 20 March 2015
Thursday, 19 March 2015
Wednesday, 18 March 2015
- RE: Meeting minutes for 18 Mar 2015 conference call
- RE: Telcon reminder and agenda for Wed. March 18
- Meeting minutes for 18 Mar 2015 conference call
- WOFF-ACTION-167: Finalize mime type application text
- WOFF-ACTION-166: Modify spec for ttc table order per jonathan kews suggestion
- Re: WOFF2 spec changes
- RE: Telcon reminder and agenda for Wed. March 18
- Re: WOFF2 spec changes
- Updated evaluation report
- Re: Telcon reminder and agenda for Wed. March 18
Tuesday, 17 March 2015
Wednesday, 11 March 2015
Tuesday, 10 March 2015
Friday, 6 March 2015
Thursday, 5 March 2015
Wednesday, 4 March 2015
- Re: First pass at TTC support, now with rewards!
- Re: Pairing glyf/loca causes fonts to fail OTS and thus be rejected by Chrome
- Minutes, 4 March 2015 webfonts WG call
- WOFF-ACTION-165: Review spec for language changes to keep spirit of physical table ordering and tables in between glyf and loca
- WOFF-ACTION-164: Bring widely used top-level-type to w3c-ietf liaison
- WOFF-ACTION-163: Rewrite section 5.4 removing nominal size concept
- Re: First pass at TTC support, now with rewards!
- Re: Pairing glyf/loca causes fonts to fail OTS and thus be rejected by Chrome
- RE: Pairing glyf/loca causes fonts to fail OTS and thus be rejected by Chrome
- RE: Pairing glyf/loca causes fonts to fail OTS and thus be rejected by Chrome
- RE: Pairing glyf/loca causes fonts to fail OTS and thus be rejected by Chrome
- Agenda for Wed., March 4th
- RE: Pairing glyf/loca causes fonts to fail OTS and thus be rejected by Chrome
- Pairing glyf/loca causes fonts to fail OTS and thus be rejected by Chrome