Re: Question about mustEmitSingleEntryDirectory tests

Hi,

OK, that makes sense. So only Test one is needed here, I assume the
input font can have multiple shared tables or does it really need to be
only one shared table?

Regards,
Khaled

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:36:05PM +0000, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> Hi Khaled,
> 
> I've been reading the test description over and over again and can't really make sense of it as written. However, based on what the spec says - there are two different test scenarios where we need to check that:
> - the TableDirectory entry for a shared table is not duplicated, and
> - the table itself appears only once in the output bytestream.
> 
> Both cases are covered by their respective individual tests ("mustEmitSingleEntryDirectory" and " mustNotDuplicateTables") so I guess the "Test two" description of "mustEmitSingleEntryDirectory" could be a lingering mistake that went unnoticed until now.
> 
> Thank you,
> Vlad
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Khaled Hosny [mailto:khaledhosny@eglug.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:53 PM
> To: WebFonts WG
> Subject: Question about mustEmitSingleEntryDirectory tests
> 
> The description of the second test in [1], confuses me a bit: It says it is not a font collection but it has a shared table, but what kind of sharing do non-collection fonts have?
> 
> Regards,
> Khaled
> 
> 1. https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool#mustEmitSingleEntryDirectory
>

Received on Thursday, 23 July 2015 00:03:20 UTC