- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:32:41 +0000
- To: "w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org)" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <760c0fbd64ef40ab80aa8d0f545f337b@wob-maildb-03.agfamonotype.org>
Online at http://www.w3.org/2015/02/11-webfonts-minutes.html and as plain text for bots below: - DRAFT - WebFonts Working Group Teleconference 11 Feb 2015 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2015/02/11-webfonts-irc Attendees Present Vlad, +1.650.253.aaaa, jfkthame, +1.250.668.aabb, John_Hudson Regrets Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe RSheeter, RSheeter_ Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Media Type for Fonts * [5]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 11 February 2015 <RSheeter> I submit we should ask Vlad to stop keeping the spec to himself :D <Vlad> scribenick: RSheeter <RSheeter_> scribenick: RSheeter_ Media Type for Fonts Vlad: we need to justify it to increase odds DK gathered evidence which he will doubtless link to <kuettel> goo.gl/zbDhUN for "Web Font Media Type (mime type) Analysis 2015" DK: images have nice tidy media type format (90%+) in the form image/<format> ... fonts have a hodgepodge of media types, many of which don't make sense (text/plain, etc) <kuettel> goo.gl/1wWcMQ for "Media Type Proposal for Fonts" Discussion of proposal. Tl;dr we want font/<format>, eg font/woff2, etc (discussion of data) <kuettel> One more link, a spreadsheet in which I collected the data (for even more file extensions/media types) <kuettel> [6]https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OiSrVqx FGr1cqjNo_Pvjrr1jYNB4pAnr_Zo07D1lZmw/edit#gid=1296519463 [6] https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OiSrVqxFGr1cqjNo_Pvjrr1jYNB4pAnr_Zo07D1lZmw/edit#gid=1296519463 Vlad: We can extend the old proposal (which we have a link to?) action-129 <trackbot> action-129 -- David Kuettel to Prepare a mime type application draft and justification for top-level "font" registration (with Vlad) -- due 2015-01-31 -- OPEN <trackbot> [7]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/129 [7] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/129 action vlad Prepare super final mime type application w/justification <trackbot> Created ACTION-162 - Prepare super final mime type application w/justification [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due 2015-02-18]. close action 129 <Vlad> action 129? close action-129 <trackbot> Closed action-129. Topic Spec Updates Vlad: is terribly sorry he didn't give anyone any notice <kuettel> [8]http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#collection_dir_format [8] http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#collection_dir_format Vlad: Changed Table directory to a parent topic with table and collection under it ... added language to keep glyf/loca pairs together ... changed numbers to 255UInt16 ... How to handle TTC format *version (exciting discussion of use of null vs 0 in spec) Question of why we have collection font flavor as you can infer type from what tables are present action jkthame Write proposal (eg email wg) on removal of flavor (because it can be inferred) <trackbot> Error finding 'jkthame'. You can review and register nicknames at <[9]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/users>. [9] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/users After much discussion, we have agreed to have further discussion once Jon writes a paragraph on the topic of dropping font flavor (which appears to apply to both collections and individual fonts) Vlad: would appreciate test plan ideas for the new test scenarios Topic TTML Fonts seems like it would fit into TTML but isn't presently covered; are we interested in this? (if we don't poke it is likely fonts will be left out) <kuettel> One quick update on the Brotli specification review front. Mark Adler setup a github repository to track his work (questions/comments on the specification and for the Brotli decoder that he is developing) @ [10]https://github.com/madler/brotli Everyone is welcome to subscribe and follow along [10] https://github.com/madler/brotli TTML group also handles WebVTT Vlad will fwd more info, suggestions on how to interact, etc Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 22:33:59 UTC