- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:32:41 +0000
- To: "w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org)" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <760c0fbd64ef40ab80aa8d0f545f337b@wob-maildb-03.agfamonotype.org>
Online at http://www.w3.org/2015/02/11-webfonts-minutes.html and as plain text for bots below:
- DRAFT -
WebFonts Working Group Teleconference
11 Feb 2015
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2015/02/11-webfonts-irc
Attendees
Present
Vlad, +1.650.253.aaaa, jfkthame, +1.250.668.aabb,
John_Hudson
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
RSheeter, RSheeter_
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Media Type for Fonts
* [5]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 11 February 2015
<RSheeter> I submit we should ask Vlad to stop keeping the spec
to himself :D
<Vlad> scribenick: RSheeter
<RSheeter_> scribenick: RSheeter_
Media Type for Fonts
Vlad: we need to justify it to increase odds
DK gathered evidence which he will doubtless link to
<kuettel> goo.gl/zbDhUN for "Web Font Media Type (mime type)
Analysis 2015"
DK: images have nice tidy media type format (90%+) in the form
image/<format>
... fonts have a hodgepodge of media types, many of which don't
make sense (text/plain, etc)
<kuettel> goo.gl/1wWcMQ for "Media Type Proposal for Fonts"
Discussion of proposal. Tl;dr we want font/<format>, eg
font/woff2, etc
(discussion of data)
<kuettel> One more link, a spreadsheet in which I collected the
data (for even more file extensions/media types)
<kuettel>
[6]https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OiSrVqx
FGr1cqjNo_Pvjrr1jYNB4pAnr_Zo07D1lZmw/edit#gid=1296519463
[6] https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OiSrVqxFGr1cqjNo_Pvjrr1jYNB4pAnr_Zo07D1lZmw/edit#gid=1296519463
Vlad: We can extend the old proposal (which we have a link to?)
action-129
<trackbot> action-129 -- David Kuettel to Prepare a mime type
application draft and justification for top-level "font"
registration (with Vlad) -- due 2015-01-31 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [7]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/129
[7] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/129
action vlad Prepare super final mime type application
w/justification
<trackbot> Created ACTION-162 - Prepare super final mime type
application w/justification [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due
2015-02-18].
close action 129
<Vlad> action 129?
close action-129
<trackbot> Closed action-129.
Topic Spec Updates
Vlad: is terribly sorry he didn't give anyone any notice
<kuettel>
[8]http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#collection_dir_format
[8] http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#collection_dir_format
Vlad: Changed Table directory to a parent topic with table and
collection under it
... added language to keep glyf/loca pairs together
... changed numbers to 255UInt16
... How to handle TTC format
*version
(exciting discussion of use of null vs 0 in spec)
Question of why we have collection font flavor
as you can infer type from what tables are present
action jkthame Write proposal (eg email wg) on removal of
flavor (because it can be inferred)
<trackbot> Error finding 'jkthame'. You can review and register
nicknames at <[9]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/users>.
[9] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/users
After much discussion, we have agreed to have further
discussion once Jon writes a paragraph on the topic of dropping
font flavor (which appears to apply to both collections and
individual fonts)
Vlad: would appreciate test plan ideas for the new test
scenarios
Topic TTML
Fonts seems like it would fit into TTML but isn't presently
covered; are we interested in this?
(if we don't poke it is likely fonts will be left out)
<kuettel> One quick update on the Brotli specification review
front. Mark Adler setup a github repository to track his work
(questions/comments on the specification and for the Brotli
decoder that he is developing) @
[10]https://github.com/madler/brotli Everyone is welcome to
subscribe and follow along
[10] https://github.com/madler/brotli
TTML group also handles WebVTT
Vlad will fwd more info, suggestions on how to interact, etc
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 22:33:59 UTC