Small comment, it (diff <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.48;r2=1.49;f=h>) says several things *may* change and therefore we MUST remove DSIG. If I was reading it for the first time I think I would wonder why DSIG is removed when none of those things had changed. Presumably it is unlikely nothing would change and it keeps things simple to just kill DSIG; I wonder if we should be more explicit about this? Rod S. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir < Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote: > Folks, > > > > I have added the details about table reordering and how changes in table > order and their corresponding offsets affect DSIG table (to justify its > removal for CFF fonts), and fixed a couple of typos along the way. > > The new version is uploaded for your reviewing pleasure! > > http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/ > > > > Cheers, > > Vlad > > >
Received on Monday, 6 April 2015 14:30:27 UTC