On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
>
> A brief update on action 155: I am still investigating the TTC handling of
> the multiple 'head' table entries and whether global checksum is being used
> and if it in fact provides any utility value or is just a "poor man's"
> approach to pretend that the aspects of security and font file integrity
> have been addressed. Nothing certain yet other than already established
> fact that the existing spec is deficient and will definitely require
> clarifications.
>
>
>
> Since we don't have any other updates (and nothing from Raph yet on the
> spec side) - should we forgo the call tomorrow and instead make an attempt
> to get things ready for discussion the week later, on Dec. 17? Please let
> me know if there are any pressing issues that you want to bring up for
> discussion tomorrow. Unless I hear from you otherwise, I will consider
> cancelling the telcon.
>
Cancelling tomorrow's and targeting Dec 17th for the next one sounds good
Vlad. Thank you.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vlad
>
>
>