- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:37:45 +0100
- To: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Hello WebFonts,
http://www.w3.org/2014/12/03-webfonts-minutes.html
and below as text for trackbot
WebFonts Working Group Teleconference
03 Dec 2014
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2014/12/03-webfonts-irc
Attendees
Present
+1.650.253.aaaa, Vlad, ChrisL, kuettel, RSheeter
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
kuettel
Contents
* [3]Topics
* [4]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 03 December 2014
<ChrisL> hi there
<ChrisL> phone is cutting out a bit, can hear mostly
<ChrisL> hi again
<RSheeter> Welcome back
scribe kuettel
Vlad: any updates on inviting Khaled as an expert?
Chris: largely approved, as a formality just need to wait a few
more days, should be all done at the end of the week
Vlad: reviewing action items, esp. 152
<ChrisL> action-152?
<trackbot> action-152 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Review and
update description field of transform glyph table -- due
2014-10-15 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [5]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/152
[5] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/152
<ChrisL>
[6]http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#glyf_table_format
[6] http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#glyf_table_format
Vlad: updated the specification to address Jonathan's feedback
... made all of the stream sizes and data types explicit
David: looks great to me
<ChrisL> close action-152
<trackbot> Closed action-152.
Vlad: OK, we could close it then
... next, reference implementation updates?
Rod: nothing new of late
Vlad: repository locations?
Rod: Brotli and WOFF 2.0 are in separate github repositories
now (where they will remain)
... updated old repository to link to the new one
<ChrisL> action-149?
<trackbot> action-149 -- Chris Lilley to Check expectations
regarding cts from ietf -- due 2014-09-23 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [7]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/149
[7] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/149
Chris: looked into it, there are conformance requirements for
...
... the test suite is not required
<ChrisL> (will mail in details)
(Chris will fully summarize with a follow on email to the
group)
Vlad: could we close action item? yes
<ChrisL> close action-149
<trackbot> Closed action-149.
Vlad: regarding Brotli, the specification review is the next
step
... as Brotli while be published as an informational RFC, then
the review is the last requirement
... Conformance Tests next
... hoping specification will be finalized about the time that
Khaled can start on the CTS (early Jan)
... question: how to handle the global check sum (when there
are more than one head tables) in a font collection
... clearly underspecified in the OpenType specification, needs
to be clarified
action vlad Clarify handling of checksum in a font collection
<trackbot> Created ACTION-155 - Clarify handling of checksum in
a font collection [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due 2014-12-10].
<ChrisL> participants at
[8]https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=44556 (Member
only link)
[8] https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=44556
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--
Best regards,
Chris Lilley, Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 21:37:47 UTC