- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:37:45 +0100
- To: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Hello WebFonts, http://www.w3.org/2014/12/03-webfonts-minutes.html and below as text for trackbot WebFonts Working Group Teleconference 03 Dec 2014 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/12/03-webfonts-irc Attendees Present +1.650.253.aaaa, Vlad, ChrisL, kuettel, RSheeter Regrets Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe kuettel Contents * [3]Topics * [4]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 03 December 2014 <ChrisL> hi there <ChrisL> phone is cutting out a bit, can hear mostly <ChrisL> hi again <RSheeter> Welcome back scribe kuettel Vlad: any updates on inviting Khaled as an expert? Chris: largely approved, as a formality just need to wait a few more days, should be all done at the end of the week Vlad: reviewing action items, esp. 152 <ChrisL> action-152? <trackbot> action-152 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Review and update description field of transform glyph table -- due 2014-10-15 -- PENDINGREVIEW <trackbot> [5]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/152 [5] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/152 <ChrisL> [6]http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#glyf_table_format [6] http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#glyf_table_format Vlad: updated the specification to address Jonathan's feedback ... made all of the stream sizes and data types explicit David: looks great to me <ChrisL> close action-152 <trackbot> Closed action-152. Vlad: OK, we could close it then ... next, reference implementation updates? Rod: nothing new of late Vlad: repository locations? Rod: Brotli and WOFF 2.0 are in separate github repositories now (where they will remain) ... updated old repository to link to the new one <ChrisL> action-149? <trackbot> action-149 -- Chris Lilley to Check expectations regarding cts from ietf -- due 2014-09-23 -- OPEN <trackbot> [7]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/149 [7] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/149 Chris: looked into it, there are conformance requirements for ... ... the test suite is not required <ChrisL> (will mail in details) (Chris will fully summarize with a follow on email to the group) Vlad: could we close action item? yes <ChrisL> close action-149 <trackbot> Closed action-149. Vlad: regarding Brotli, the specification review is the next step ... as Brotli while be published as an informational RFC, then the review is the last requirement ... Conformance Tests next ... hoping specification will be finalized about the time that Khaled can start on the CTS (early Jan) ... question: how to handle the global check sum (when there are more than one head tables) in a font collection ... clearly underspecified in the OpenType specification, needs to be clarified action vlad Clarify handling of checksum in a font collection <trackbot> Created ACTION-155 - Clarify handling of checksum in a font collection [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due 2014-12-10]. <ChrisL> participants at [8]https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=44556 (Member only link) [8] https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=44556 Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] -- Best regards, Chris Lilley, Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 21:37:47 UTC