- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:39:27 +0200
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- CC: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
Hello John, Sunday, October 20, 2013, 7:49:42 PM, you wrote: > I'm keen to understand how this mechanism might best operate in a > webfonts environment (particularly with dynamic text that might be > displaying at different sizes on different devices or layouts), and > whether automatic size-specific design selection would require any > modifications or extensions to the CSS @font-face handling. The original @font-face definition, as developed by the first webfonts WG and standardised in CSS2, included a font-size descriptor: This is the descriptor for the sizes provided by this font. Only absolute length units are permitted, in contrast to the 'font-size' property, which allows both relative and absolute lengths and sizes. A comma-separated list of absolute lengths is permitted. The initial value of 'all' is suitable for most scalable fonts, so this descriptor is primarily for use in an @font-face for bitmap fonts, or scalable fonts designed to be rasterised at a restricted range of font sizes. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/fonts.html#descdef-font-size Unfortunately CSS3 Fonts drops this descriptor, presumably on the grounds that no-one uses bitmapped fonts anymore (though the coloured raster-based fonts from Apple and Google may induce a revival) and presumably because no-one seemed to be using optical sizing, multiple masters, and so on. However, it would seem possible to resurrect this descriptor, perhaps in CSS4 Fonts. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 13:39:29 UTC