- From: Adam Twardoch (List) <list.adam@twardoch.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:35:41 +0200
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
Dear Webfonts WG members, I'd like to ask: Is there any work or current state regarding support for TTC as a webfont file format? TTC is a potentially useful compression mechanism for font families. It's supported natively as desktop format on Mac OS X and Windows. Microsoft uses it primarily for CJK fonts but many of Apple's "simple" fonts which are bundled with Mac OS X and iOS come as TTCs. (In Apple's case, the switch was made in Mac OS X 10.6, I believe -- before that, Apple used their custom DFONT container, and before that, TrueType suitcases). The TTC obviously has the advantage that an SFNT table whose content is identical across all members of a family (such as, for example, cmap or GSUB) can be stored once, while tables whose content is unique to each font are stored individually. I believe (though am not sure) that the structure sharing can even be done on a subtable level). A potentially great compression mechanism, specific to SFNT, and potentially really useful for serving entire families as one file -- I think it would deserve being considered for webfont deployment. Of course there's some caveats: since TTC is "one file" which stores several "subfonts", I believe @font-face might need to be modified somehow so that it allows selection of the subfonts. So -- I wonder: * Has any browser manufacturer tried to implement TTC support? * Would it make sense? * Am I right that the CSS @font-face clause would have to be extended somehow? * Where is the current spec for TTC (or "OTC" as it's been proposed to rename for inclusion of CFF tables)? * Are we aware of any publicly available tools to pack/unpack TTC files? Oh, I just see that this topic has already been discussed in May 2012 on the CSS fonts list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0217.html (Better view at:) http://w3-org.9356.n7.nabble.com/css3-fonts-truetype-collection-td23567.html ...with no apparent conclusion. As there does not seem to be much movement on the CSS3 Fonts list this year, and I believe the WebFonts WG is to some extent relevant to discussing this item briefly (primarily because we're focusing on compression now, and TTC *is* compression above all things), I'm raising it here. Best, Adam -- May success attend your efforts, -- Adam Twardoch (Remove "list." from e-mail address to contact me directly.)
Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 14:36:11 UTC