- From: David Kuettel <kuettel@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:40:26 -0700
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Cc: 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>, Adam Twardoch <list.adam@twardoch.com>
- Message-ID: <CAAYUqgHDrex__V9HE9O=hwy18ue22nXSz_wj1MBK5pOw5Cv84g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:55 PM, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote: > Two items: > > 1. Current thinking is to hold the face-to-face in Portland on the > *afternoon* of Thursday 22 August, probably starting around one o'clock. > Christopher currently has the room booked for the whole day, in case we > decide we want the morning instead of or in addition to the afternoon, but > if we definitely don't need it in the morning we should let him know as > soon as possible, so that he can release it for other use. > 1PM on Thursday the 22nd is perfect. Thank you John and Christopher! Looking forward to the opportunity for us to all meet in person. > > 2. Adam Twardoch has raised some interesting ideas on the Typedrawers > forum regarding possible 'sanitisation' of OpenType sfnt data in WOFF 2.0, > which I have encouraged him to outline for the working group as a basis for > discussion. Unfortunately, the Typedrawers site is down at the moment, so I > can't provide a link, but will do so as soon as possible. In the meantime, > the basics of Adam's suggestion is that certain legacy or redundant data > that is permitted in the OT/OFF spec might be identified as out-of-limits > for WOFF 2.0, and hence a) provide user agents with a smaller set of > variables and more strictly defined data set and b) help font developers to > make smaller, targeted webfonts. It seems, at very least, something worth > kicking around. Typedrawers seems to be up again. Here is a direct link to the post: http://typedrawers.com/discussion/comment/5210/#Comment_5210 I would agree with you John, this could make for a great discussion at the meeting on August 22nd, and further, that a set of recommendations for better web fonts (without the legacy bloat) would be a great thing. Even if completely decoupled from the W3C WOFF 2.0 specification.
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 02:41:14 UTC