Re: Quick WOFF 2.0 update

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:29 PM, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote:

> Thanks, David.
>
> I note in your example that you also have a webfont file suffix
> distinction:
>
>    url ... Amiri-Slanted.woff2
>>   url ... Amiri-Slanted.woff
>>
>
> Is this intended to be a standard version distinction?


No, the browser would only look at the format hint, e.g. format("woff2")
and not the filename or extension.

The use of the .woff2 (arbitrary) filename extension, simplified the static
file serving for us.

>
> JH
>
>
>
>