- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:13:30 +0200
- To: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>
- CC: WOFF Working Group <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, June 7, 2012, 8:01:30 PM, I wrote: CL> My conclusions from all this are that we should: CL> a) add this missing test to the test suite, and update the CL> implementation reports to add results for it I'm doing that now. Tal has reviewed the test and tells me it looks fine. CL> b) change the first assertion by CL> - removing the assertion markup CL> - changing MUST to must CL> c) Move CSS3 Fonts from the normative to the informative references CL> section, as the changes at b) make it informative. Vlad has indicated that this is the correct way forward and I have also had a couple of offlist messages indicating this. In the absence of any articulated dissent this still looks the best way forward to me. Jonathan, do you have the time to do those edits? (If not I can do them). -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 16:15:19 UTC