- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:56:52 +0100
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
Hello public-webfonts-wg, WOFF 1.0 continues to be in CR while we wait for implementations to fix bugs so we meet CR exit criteria. CR published 24 Aug 2011 http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-WOFF-20110804/ ED updated to remove features at risk, 4 Jan 2012 http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/spec/ WOFF 1.0 marks up all conformable statements, and we have 100% test coverage for those statements. Conformance is defined for three things: - user agents CR criteria NOT met on 14 of 291 tests http://w3c-test.org/framework/review/woff-ua/ implementations aggregated into four independent groups (Gecko Presto Trident WebKit) all implementations fail in the overlapping tables and extraneous data tests. Working on getting the browsers to fix their bugs. Tal Leming is writing a second implementation of the (optional) woff metadata display feature. - authoring tools CR criteria met on 24 of 24 tests http://w3c-test.org/framework/review/woff-at/ three implementations (FontSquirrel sfnt2woff woffTools) trying to get fontforge to fix their bug which causes all tests to fail, but we don't need that to exit CR - woff files themselves CR criteria met implementations are the individual woff files we have a validator that tests all spec assertions, http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/tools/validator/ and a test suit of 303 tests to exercise the validator http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/tests/Format/Tests/xhtml1/testcaseindex.xht validator passes 100% of tests most fonts found in the wild are valid, apart from those made with fontforge, which have one error. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 06:56:52 UTC