RE: WOFF metadata - spec prose vs. RNG

Great, thank you!
Vlad


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:21 AM
> To: Levantovsky, Vladimir
> Cc: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org Group
> Subject: Re: WOFF metadata - spec prose vs. RNG
> 
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 10:46:38 PM, Vladimir wrote:
> 
> LV> -   vendor element: ‘name’ attribute is required in the spec / RNG
> has it as optional;
> fixed in RNG
> 
> LV> -   credit element: ‘role’ attribute is optional in the spec /
> required in RNG (?);
> fixed in RNG
> 
> LV> -   description element: ‘text’ element is optional / required in
> RNG (?);
> not changed, see email from Jonathan
> 
> LV> -   licensee element: ‘name’ attribute is required, ‘dir’
> LV> and ‘class’ are optional / all three are required in RNG (?);
> fixed in RNG
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
>  Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
>  Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups

Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 13:45:29 UTC