- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:37:36 +0200
- To: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>
- CC: "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org Group" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 8:50:26 PM, Jonathan wrote: JK> I've committed some changes to the text today in order to address JK> the div/span and @dir/@class issue, and also the xml:lang and JK> BCP47 stuff. If you have a chance to review these and see whether JK> it all makes sense, that would be great. Thanks! In general this looks great. I think it would be clearer,in the attribute lists, to say xml:lang rather than just saying lang and expecting people to remember its in another namespace. Also, since the xml namespace is special and predeclared, people will always use xml:lang rather than foo:lang with the foo prefix bound to the xml namespace. Its fine to leave the FSI and Ascender examples as-is, but the first example should be updated to use xml:lang. (the corresponding stand-alone file has already been so updated). Similarly the example of div, should use xml:lang not lang. The list of changes needs to note change to xml:lang, @dir, @class, div and span in response to last call comments. Check for other changes in response to last call comments, too... bcp47 should be a normative reference Also, 'is expected' - tighten to SHOULD? -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 12:37:39 UTC