- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:41:42 -0400
- To: "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D0BE7CF9BF3@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org>
http://www.w3.org/2011/06/29-webfonts-minutes.html and below as plain text: - DRAFT - WebFonts Working Group Teleconference 29 Jun 2011 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/06/29-webfonts-irc Attendees Present Regrets Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe John Contents * [3]Topics * [4]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 29 June 2011 <Vlad> As part of the call I'd like to discuss and finalize this: [5]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jun/00 93.html [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jun/0093.html <jdaggett> Vlad: i'm here, just trying to connect via skype... Vlad opens with discussion of Samsung objection JD: seems nothing new from Glenn Vlad: difficult to get solid informaton re. concern JD: Is Vlad aware of video spec referencing early W3C drafts? Vlad: Not with reference to css-fonts. V: Glenn now saying he is interested in future compatibility. JD: All seem proxy arguments for making same origin restriction optional. Vlad; Specs intended to enable interoperability. Profile specs may differ, but this is not concern of W3C Tal: Have there been other css-font changes that have been backwards incompatible? JD: difficult to say due to problems of CSS2... not really implementable and hence removed for CSS3 V: Comfortable keeping fomal objection on record and making the case to W3C JD: Is timing of objection re. css-fonts appropriate (not last call yet) V: for WOFF spec timing is appropriate <sgalineau> from his last message I do not think Glenn even understands that the requirement only applies to requests from the src descriptor JD: Concern that Hakon wants same origin moved from css-fonts to other spec JD But confident that can handleformal objection from Samsung JD: Will bring up issue at CSS WG call re. locaton of same origin; move to vote. Vlad will send draft liason message to CSS after this call. <Vlad> As part of the call I'd like to discuss and finalize this: [6]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jun/00 93.html [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jun/0093.html Liason asks CSS WG to support css-fonts draft to spec same origin V: Open action items.... <Vlad> action 93 - close <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - 93 <jdaggett> sorry, i have to run now... <Vlad> action 93? <trackbot> Sorry, bad ACTION syntax <Vlad> action 93, status? <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - 93, <Vlad> action Vlad, status? <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Vlad, V: closing action item to draft liason w/ CSS WG (93) Tal: waiting for last call to end before closing test action V: three more action items with Chris Lilley. WIll wait to hear from him re. these. Other items? Chris: Anyone else going to TypeCon? John: yes Call ended. Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 14:42:08 UTC