- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:54:19 +0000
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, "3668 FONT" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F017829040ED4@TK5EX14MBXC296.redmond.corp.microsoft.co>
I certainly had no objection but, to my embarrassment, managed to miss the call :( Looking forward to the minutes ! From: Levantovsky, Vladimir [mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:35 AM To: Sylvain Galineau; 3668 FONT Subject: RE: Conference call reminder and agenda, Wed. June 22 Sylvain, all, I would like to invite Glenn Adams to join our telcon this afternoon. Please let me know if you have any objections to it, no reply is needed if you don't mind having Glenn to join us for WG telcon. Thank you, Vlad From: Sylvain Galineau [mailto:sylvaing@microsoft.com]<mailto:[mailto:sylvaing@microsoft.com]> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:21 AM To: Levantovsky, Vladimir; 3668 FONT Subject: RE: Conference call reminder and agenda, Wed. June 22 I have missed far too many calls lately but will make this one. Do we know if Glenn Adams will join the call ? It would seem more productive to discuss the issue with the person who objects; it seems some clarifications are in order. From: public-webfonts-wg-request@w3.org<mailto:public-webfonts-wg-request@w3.org> [mailto:public-webfonts-wg-request@w3.org]<mailto:[mailto:public-webfonts-wg-request@w3.org]> On Behalf Of Levantovsky, Vladimir Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 7:25 PM To: 3668 FONT Subject: Conference call reminder and agenda, Wed. June 22 Hello WG, We will have our regularly scheduled call tomorrow at: US West Coast - 13:00 US East Coast - 16:00 Central Europe - 22:00 Japan - 05:00 (next day) Zakim telephone bridge: +1.617.761.6200 (Boston) or +33.4.26.46.79.03 (Paris) or +44.203.318.0479 (London) with conference code 3668 ("FONT") IRC channel is #webfonts, irc://irc.w3.org:6665/webfonts or http://irc.w3.org/?channels=webfonts Agenda: 1. Discuss formal objection raised by Samsung (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2011AprJun/0069.html and the whole thread for this discussion); 2. Review open action items http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open and update the issue tracker if applicable http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/DoC/issues-lc-2010.html Thank you, Vlad
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 20:55:00 UTC