- From: Tab Atkins <tabatkins@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:13:30 -0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, "info@ascenderfonts.com" <info@ascenderfonts.com>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > So I'd still rather move on. If Opera or WebKit want to make some misguided > statement by being non-conformant with this requirement, it's their call. > If Mozilla and Microsoft prefer better interoperability and a specification > that reflects it, it's their call too. As long as you're OK with that, so > am I. I can't speak officially, as I haven't spoken to the relevant people in a while, but as far as I know there is no objection on the Webkit side to the SOR, we just didn't implement it at first and haven't gotten around to it. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:14:00 UTC