- From: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:10:13 -0500
- To: WOFF Working Group FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Minutes at http://www.w3.org/2011/01/26-webfonts-minutes.html and below as text [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WebFonts Working Group Teleconference 26 Jan 2011 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jan/0024.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/01/26-webfonts-irc Attendees Present Regrets Tal, ChrisL, Sylvain Chair Vlad Scribe Tal Contents * [4]Topics * [5]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <Vlad> rrsagent help <Vlad> trackbot, start telcon <trackbot> Date: 26 January 2011 <Vlad> Chair Vlad <jfkthame> vlad, i'm only catching 50% of what you're saying, at best <erik> I'm calling in on skype, I can't actually make out anyone, sorry. Reviewing open actions. <Vlad> action 56? <trackbot> Sorry, bad ACTION syntax <Vlad> action-56? <trackbot> ACTION-56 -- Jonathan Kew to tag wrng size compressed meta as a ua assert -- due 2010-12-15 -- OPEN <trackbot> [6]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/56 [6] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/56 <Vlad> action-56: pending <trackbot> ACTION-56 Tag wrng size compressed meta as a ua assert notes added Changed Action-56 to "pending review." Action-60 can be closed. Discussion about Action-62. Will pick up later or discuss later. Discussion about the meaning Action-66. Action-69 can be closed. Vlad completed this one. Discussion of comments from Bert Bos. [7]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2011JanMar/0009.html [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2011JanMar/0009.html Point 1: Vlad asked for clarification. Håkon: agrees with Bert's comment. Thinks that the comment is about SOR and relates to recent discussion on list. Vlad: not sure that it is about SOR. Håkon: Thinks that there is not yet a consensus on SOR. Håkon: WOFF would have a better shot at interoperability if there is consensus on SOR. Vlad: We should discuss this but not today as we are discussion Bert's comments. Discussion about when to discuss SOR. Håkon: We don't have all browser vendors here. Tal: They have been invited. It is their responsibility to call in. Vald: This is not on the agenda for the day. Let's discuss this later. Vlad: THis will be a detailed discussion so let's set up a call specifically for this topic. Back to Bert's comments. Point 2: Vlad: We agree with Bert that we have made the intro as clear as we can. Any other comments for making it even more clear are welcome. Vald: "Despite this name, WOFF should be regarded as a container format or "wrapper" for font data in already-existing formats rather than an actual font format in its own right." Vlad: Perhaps add "Despite the name, WOFF is not a new font format and should be regarded as..." Christopher: Thinks that the language is clear enough as is. Jonathan: No strong view either way. Doesn't mind changing it but isn't sure that any value will be added. Vlad: Should we create an action item to review the first paragraph of the introduction? Christopher: Bert's comment was "it sounds good" so why are we discussing changing it? Vlad: This one particular sentence could be more specific. Point 3: Jonathan: His original tool, and the spec, did not pad. Not sure when the optional padding made it into the spec. Vlad: Any objections to wat Bert proposes? Tal: If we make that SHOULD a MUST, would a UA have to test and reject? Jonathan: UA could test with the header length of file and length of block. Vlad and Tal: Would that contradict the "Private Data should not effect the font data..." section of the spec? Jonathan: This would be a problem with the header, not the private data. ... UA could do simple sanity checks on header fields. Vlad: Does that need to be mentioned in the header? Jonathan: Reads spec. We already call for the UA to check those offsets. Vlad: Should we not mention padding the private data? Jonathan: We could repeat that the end of the private data block must be the end of the file. Vlad: Agrees with Jonathan. Tal: Agrees. <Vlad> Scribe: Tal Action Jonathan Replace last sentence of section 7: End of Private Data block must correspond with the end of the last file. <trackbot> Created ACTION-70 - Replace last sentence of section 7: End of Private Data block must correspond with the end of the last file. [on Jonathan Kew - due 2011-02-02]. <Vlad> Scribenick: tal Discussion on if this should apply to the metadata block as well. Vlad: Metadata section is clear. Point 4: Vlad: Can anyone clarify what this means? Action Chris Clarify Bert Bos' Point 4 <trackbot> Created ACTION-71 - Clarify Bert Bos' Point 4 [on Chris Lilley - due 2011-02-02]. Point 5: Vlad: not sure how useful it would be to not store origLength. Jonathan: UA needs to know original length to allocate buffer otherwise it is more cumbersome to decode. Action Jonathan Respond to Bert Bos' Point 5. <trackbot> Created ACTION-72 - Respond to Bert Bos' Point 5. [on Jonathan Kew - due 2011-02-02]. Sergey: origLength is also useful for recreating table directory. ... Mentions email to list that has not been discussed: [8]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2011JanMar/0005.html [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2011JanMar/0005.html Tal: This can be created dynamically. Sergey: Yes. We should mention this in the spec. Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [9]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([10]CVS log) $Date: 2011/01/26 16:06:11 $ _________________________________________________________ [9] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [10] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ Scribe.perl diagnostic output [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.] This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at [11]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002 /scribe/ [11] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Tal Inferring ScribeNick: tal Found ScribeNick: tal WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Christopher Jonathan P13 P16 Scribenick Sergey Tal Va ld Vlad aabb aacc aadd aaee aaff action-56 cslye erik jfkthame jfkthame _afk joined sergeym trackbot webfonts You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Tal ChrisL Sylvain Agenda: [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011 Jan/0024.html Found Date: 26 Jan 2011 Guessing minutes URL: [13]http://www.w3.org/2011/01/26-webfonts-minutes .html People with action items: [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jan/0024.html [13] http://www.w3.org/2011/01/26-webfonts-minutes.html WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report End of [14]scribe.perl diagnostic output] [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:10:47 UTC