- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:15:43 +0000
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: Erik van Blokland <erik@letterror.com>, "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
> To the best of my knowledge, that is not the case. Most hosting providers > these days give their customers a way to customize response headers. Those > few that do not would likely also not enable sending the correct Content- > Type for WOFF fonts, which would likely either defeat same-origin > restrictions tied to the format or simply not work at all. So I don't > think it is sensible to focus on highly locked down hosting scenarios. I don't understand this point as this assumes browsers need a correct Content-Type. I don't believe that's true today.
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 21:47:07 UTC